As the two-year anniversary of Balthazar’s death approaches,
I have been thinking a lot about the idea of redemption. Though Merriam-Webster
defines redemption simply as the act of making something better or more
acceptable, redemption is still an old-timey, Jesus-y word. It’s invoked in all
kinds of contexts in our secular society: Lindsey Jacobellis is looking for
redemption in snowboard cross; a former gang member finds redemption directing
a center for homeless youth. And yet no matter what the story, the redeemed
appear as if bathed in celestial light, touched by the hand of God.
Which makes the obverse also true.
A baby’s death is such an extreme event I’m not sure that it’s
appropriate or even possible to talk about it in terms of redemption. Can it be
made better? Will it ever be in any way acceptable? Still, from observing the Facebook
pages of other mothers I know, having another child appears to be, if not the
path to redemption then at least the sine qua non of healing. The parents still
suffer, of course, and always will. There’s no taking that away. The lost child
can never be replaced. But by virtue of the fact that the new baby would not
exist without the loss of the other, he or she creates an entirely new, joyful
future for the family.
It’s not a secret that this was the form I hoped that
redemption would take. I asked my husband to try again after Balthazar, and he
said no. It’s hard to know how I would have reacted to secondary infertility,
or miscarriage, or another stillbirth, or any other scenario in which I failed
to produce the requisite “rainbow” baby. I suspect not well. Maybe Jonathan’s
right and that would have been the path to madness. But that’s all speculation.
For a long time I wanted to wear a sign that said, “I want
another baby, and there’s no medical reason I can’t have one. It’s him!” With a
big arrow pointing to the space next to me. But I don’t feel that way so much
anymore, maybe because the space next to me is now empty. I’m creating an
entirely new future for myself, and I don’t spend as much time thinking about
it. But redemption? I can’t imagine what
that would even look like.
Not long ago one of my Facebook moms, someone I met in a
research study out of the University of Nebraska, posted a shout out to all of
her friends who’ve had “rainbow” babies. Which I can tell you is pretty much
every single woman I know who lost a child this way. Every. Single. One.
I usually just “like” the photos of the adorable children
and leave it at that, but I must have been feeling particularly beleaguered
that day, because I “liked” the post, as usual, but then I also said, “Please
also have compassion for babyloss moms who don’t have “rainbow” babies and
never will.”
My Facebook friend deleted my comment. That’s the kind of
sad story you should just keep to yourself, you know?
Even if, like me, you lost your Christian faith somewhere
along the way, it’s hard not to feel that redemption shines God’s light on you,
deserved or not, and that to fail to find it leaves you in shadow, outside the
halo of grace.
*
An alternate scenario was that my memoir would become my
rainbow baby. But I’ve had to rethink that as well, because 20 editors have
rejected the manuscript, with variations on the same theme:
“It’s hard to bring
this subject to the reader unless you’re Joan Didion,” said one, which in
translation means: we will tolerate this kind of anguish from famous essayist,
but not you. “Other memoirs of this type have struggled to find an audience,”
said another. Until they said that I had no idea that Elizabeth McCracken and
Emily Rapp had poor sales figures. My personal favorite, though, is this one:
“Its readership is limited because it isn’t redemptive enough.”
It’s an interesting situation, to have your life declared
too dark for public consumption. I don’t know what to say except that I object.
One of Jonathan’s friends, who is a documentary filmmaker,
said that an audience isn’t looking for the Hollywood ending necessarily. There
doesn’t have to be a “rainbow” baby, he said, but I have to have learned
something by the end, something along the lines of, I’m grateful for what I
have.
I’ll tell you this: I am a better person because of
Balthazar. I’m more compassionate, kinder, quicker to help others. I am more
open, more vulnerable, more emotionally available, more able to receive help.
But to sugar-coat it and pretend that the price wasn’t more than anyone should
be asked to pay; well, I just can’t do it. To pretend that I’m actually grateful
that my son died, I can’t do it. Would I trade it all to be a clueless mom of
two, untouched by tragedy, the kind who would unknowingly say stupid shit to
someone like me? Yes I would.
I’ve lost a lot. More than my baby. My place in the world, my
idea of myself, who I thought I was. I’ve been stripped down to the bone. I’ve
been forced to say, well, I have my health and my brains and, for what it’s
worth, my heart, and that’s going to have to be enough somehow.
I suspect that I’m not alone. I suspect that many people are
experiencing something similar without knowing how to talk about it. Some of
them might be interested in reading about those feelings. It might make them
feel less alone. How many, I don’t know. Maybe not enough to satisfy the Viacom
Corporation, but more than a few.
Maybe the solution is to wait until redemption finds me.
Maybe it’s to take the book to a small press, the literary equivalent of indie
film. I am going to look at the manuscript and see if I can rewrite it. But I
think it would be a disservice to truth and to all the people out there whose
lives are happening outside the confines of the acceptable narrative to tack on
some saccharine passage or chapter to make other people more comfortable.
That’s not me.
I’m grateful for what I have. It’s not easy. It’s day to
day. Sometimes minute to minute.
Is that too dark?